Click on the logo above for the Recent Judgement regarding the burial of Richard 3rd
King Richard III
Richard 3rd as constructed from his actual skull which was recently discovered at Leicester United Kingdom and contemporary paintings
see Discovery of the remains of Richard 2rd by the Leicester University team
http://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/books/434776/The-search-for-Richard-III-by-Philippa-Langley-and-Michael-Jones-review
see Discovery of the remains of Richard 2rd by the Leicester University team
http://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/books/434776/The-search-for-Richard-III-by-Philippa-Langley-and-Michael-Jones-review
DISCOVERY OF RICHARD 3RD'S BURIAL SITE -
Now, as a result of an inspired piece of archaeological detective work, the bones have unexpectedly surfaced from beneath the parking lot. Why their reappearance should thrill the members of the Richard III Society, who helped to fund the whole project, is not altogether clear. The base of the skull was shattered by a violent blow, probably from a halberd, that particularly gruesome two-handed pole weapon favored by late-medieval soldiers. So the King was presumably killed from behind, and his bones bear marks of what are called “humiliation injuries”—that is, stab wounds through the buttocks and elsewhere that must have been inflicted on his corpse by people in a frenzy of loathing.
But the most interesting piece of evidence is the spine, weirdly curved in a ghastly S. It’s startling, seeming to confirm More’s adjective “croke backed” and to conjure up the figure that has actually provoked the worldwide press coverage. That figure is not the historical Richard III but, rather, the fantastic villain that Shakespeare fashioned from More’s slanders and unleashed in the early fifteen-nineties onto the London stage. http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2013/02/the-shape-of-a-life-richard-iiis-twisted-bones.html The Shape of Life -by Richard Greenblatt New Yorker
Portrait of King
Richard 3rd
The Earl of Loudoun is directly descended from King Edward 3rd and is regarded by many as the Rightful King of England as the direct descendant of Richard's brother George the Duke of Clarance. The famous television presenter Tony Robinson conducted the research for his BBC production of The Rightful King of England and discovered that it was the present Earl of Loudoun. see You Tube documentary by Tony Robinson at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DCasz6oeL4
During Richard's reign, the historian John Rous praised him as a "good lord" who punished "oppressors of the commons", adding that he had "a great heart".[69][70] After his death, Richard's image was tarnished by propaganda fostered by his Tudor successors (who sought to legitimise their claim to the throne),[71] culminating in the famous portrayal of him in Shakespeare's play Richard III as a physically deformed machiavellian villain, albeit courageous and witty, cheerfully committing numerous murders in order to claw his way to power. Rous himself, in his History of the Kings of England, written during Henry VII's reign, initiated the process. He reversed his earlier position, and now portrayed Richard as a freakish individual who was born with teeth and shoulder-length hair after having been in his mother's womb for two years. His body was stunted and distorted, with one shoulder higher than the other, and he was "slight in body and weak in strength". Rous also attributes the murder of Henry VI to Richard. Wikipedia
Richard 3rd
The Earl of Loudoun is directly descended from King Edward 3rd and is regarded by many as the Rightful King of England as the direct descendant of Richard's brother George the Duke of Clarance. The famous television presenter Tony Robinson conducted the research for his BBC production of The Rightful King of England and discovered that it was the present Earl of Loudoun. see You Tube documentary by Tony Robinson at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DCasz6oeL4
During Richard's reign, the historian John Rous praised him as a "good lord" who punished "oppressors of the commons", adding that he had "a great heart".[69][70] After his death, Richard's image was tarnished by propaganda fostered by his Tudor successors (who sought to legitimise their claim to the throne),[71] culminating in the famous portrayal of him in Shakespeare's play Richard III as a physically deformed machiavellian villain, albeit courageous and witty, cheerfully committing numerous murders in order to claw his way to power. Rous himself, in his History of the Kings of England, written during Henry VII's reign, initiated the process. He reversed his earlier position, and now portrayed Richard as a freakish individual who was born with teeth and shoulder-length hair after having been in his mother's womb for two years. His body was stunted and distorted, with one shoulder higher than the other, and he was "slight in body and weak in strength". Rous also attributes the murder of Henry VI to Richard. Wikipedia
The True King of England
It goes back to medieval England and the reign of King Edward IV. Edward ruled England from 1461 to his death in 1483, a period marked by the Wars of the Roses. These were a series of violent dynastic squabbles between two rival branches of the Plantagenet family – the houses of Lancaster and York (whose heraldic symbols were the red and white roses) for the English Crown. Edward was born 28 April 1442 in Rouen, France, where his father, Richard of York, was on campaign. The documentary presented doubts that Richard was Edward’s biological father. Those doubts were nothing new. Even during Edward’s own lifetime it was noted that he showed little resemblance to his father; Edward had a large round face and lantern-jaw, whereas Richard of York had thinner, pointed facial features. Edward, at over 6 feet, was also exceptionally tall for the period, which was unusual for the House of York. The documentary cited records found in Rouen Cathedral’s archives which revealed that, from 14 July to 21 August 1441, the 5-week period in which Edward must have been conceived, Richard was away fighting at Pontoise, several days’ march from Rouen (where Edward’s mother Cecily of York was based). It is unlikely that Edward was born premature, as there is no evidence from the time to suggest that he was (premature babies with a claim to the throne were a risk and therefore almost certainly would have had their births recorded). Also, the christening of Edmund, Earl of Rutland, Richard and Cecily’s second son, was a lavish public celebration in Rouen Cathedral, whereas Edward’s christening was a low key and private ceremony in a side chapel, despite being the firstborn son.
It is possible of course that Richard could have returned to Rouen from Pontoise, or that Edward could have been born premature. Richard never contested his paternity. However, the documentary considered that, if Edward was indeed illegitimate, then every single monarch who came after him followed the wrong bloodline to the throne.
The crown should have gone to Edward’s younger brother George, the Duke of Clarence. As George was the direct ancestor of Mike Hastings then, under the strict rules of succession, Mike should have been on the throne, not Elizabeth II.
Lee Rimmer 11th July /20012
See URL http://www.abroadintheyard.com/real-king-of-england-dies-in-australia-true-royal-lineage-which-would-have-changed-british-history/
The Claim
Britain's Real Monarch
This is "based on the research of Glasgow University mediaevalist Michael Jones, who claimed to have unearthed a document at Rouen Cathedral proving that at the time of the conception of Edward IV (who reigned, with interruptions, from 1461 until 1483), his supposed parents, Richard Duke of York and Lady Cicely Neville, were more than 160 kilometres apart. Richard was fighting the French near Paris, while Lady Cicely was at court in Rouen. Jones argued that Edward was the product of an adulterous liaison between the Queen and a French archer. The theory, if true, would invalidate the claims of every English monarch since.
Since Edward was illegitimate, Jones argued, the royal line should have descended through his (supposedly legitimate) younger brother George, Duke of Clarence (who would, according to tradition, meet a sticky end in a butt of Malmsey wine in 1478). With the help of Debrett's, Jones had traced the Plantagenet blood line down through the generations to the Earl of Loudoun - Mike Hastings."
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/obituaries/the-jerilderie-man-who-could-have-been-king-20120705-21jwz.html
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/comment/obituaries/the-jerilderie-man-who-could-have-been-king-20120705-21jwz.html#ixzz322GedS8I
Britain's Real Monarch
This is "based on the research of Glasgow University mediaevalist Michael Jones, who claimed to have unearthed a document at Rouen Cathedral proving that at the time of the conception of Edward IV (who reigned, with interruptions, from 1461 until 1483), his supposed parents, Richard Duke of York and Lady Cicely Neville, were more than 160 kilometres apart. Richard was fighting the French near Paris, while Lady Cicely was at court in Rouen. Jones argued that Edward was the product of an adulterous liaison between the Queen and a French archer. The theory, if true, would invalidate the claims of every English monarch since.
Since Edward was illegitimate, Jones argued, the royal line should have descended through his (supposedly legitimate) younger brother George, Duke of Clarence (who would, according to tradition, meet a sticky end in a butt of Malmsey wine in 1478). With the help of Debrett's, Jones had traced the Plantagenet blood line down through the generations to the Earl of Loudoun - Mike Hastings."
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/obituaries/the-jerilderie-man-who-could-have-been-king-20120705-21jwz.html
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/comment/obituaries/the-jerilderie-man-who-could-have-been-king-20120705-21jwz.html#ixzz322GedS8I
